China, Russia and Undersea Cable Vulnerability: Shoring Up Protection
Niklas Swanström
The global undersea cable network, carrying up to 99 percent of international internet traffic, faces increasing vulnerabilities. Recent incidents in the Baltic Sea and around Taiwan highlight the urgent need for enhanced protection measures and international cooperation. The mere possibility of cable interference can create significant anxiety in financial markets and erode public confidence in critical infrastructure, having a huge psychological impact. The attribution challenges associated with cable attacks further compound these psychological effects.
Russia and China are developing alternative cable routes and systems that could reduce Western control over global communications infrastructure. The competition extends to technical standards and protocols, with both nations pushing for more significant influence in international standards bodies. If successful, this creates potential long-term vulnerabilities, as control over technical standards could facilitate future exploitation. China’s approach to undersea cable warfare combines technological sophistication with strategic infrastructure development. China has significantly expanded its influence over global cable infrastructure under the Digital Silk Road initiative. Both Russia and China have invested heavily in dual-use marine research infrastructure that can support cable interference operations. Maritime assets like oceanographic research vessels, deep-sea submersibles, and sophisticated mapping capabilities provide plausible deniability for the aggressor, while maintaining significant operational capabilities. Developments in quantum sensing and autonomous underwater vehicle technologies present new hurdles for cable protection.
The combination of physical vulnerability, technical sophistication, and geopolitical complexity creates unique challenges that require innovative solutions and unprecedented international cooperation.
- Early warning systems powered by sophisticated detection and monitoring tools need to be supported by enhanced information sharing among allies and improved coordination between commercial operators and national security entities.
- Greater international cooperation includes joint monitoring operations, shared response protocols, and coordinated legal frameworks for attribution and response, as well as setting up multinational cable protection zones.
- The legal framework for cable protection should include development of clear attribution protocols, establishment of multinational response mechanisms, and creation of effective deterrence frameworks. The legal structure must balance the need for cable protection with commercial operational requirements and international maritime law.
- Investment in next-generation cable technologies and development of alternative communication technologies must be accelerated.
- There is urgent need for enhanced backup systems and alternative routing capabilities while developing protocols for operating under degraded connectivity conditions. This includes the establishment of distributed data centers with multiple redundant connections and a development of a sync transaction processing capabilities for critical systems.
- Nations must develop comprehensive economic defense frameworks integrating cable protection with broader financial system security.
Related Publications
-
China as a Black Sea Actor: An Alternate Route
China’s international role has expanded rapidly in the last decades, and the Greater Central Asian region, Europe, and the Middle East, to which the Black Sea region (BSR) connects, are […]
-
The US and EU, and the Emerging Supply Chain Network: Politics, Prospects, and Allies
The Global Supply Chains have evolved from simply logistical achievements to being the bedrock of the global economy. Driven by technological advances and geopolitical shifts, this transformation underscores the critical […]
-
The Economic Leash: China’s Financial Tethers and Global Power Plays
China’s emphasis on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth and its integration into global markets have allowed it to wield significant influence internationally. Nonetheless, this focus on rapid expansion has created […]
-
Hegemony at a Crossroads: The Inverse Dynamics of China’s Global Strategy
Here is my bold statement. Hard power projection decimates soft power but only for authoritarian states. In the early 21st century, I was living in Beijing and at that time […]
-
Safeguarding intellectual property in the wake of digital authoritarianism: An Interview with DR. REBECCA SPYKE KEISER
Dr. Rebecca Spyke Keiser is the Chief of Research Security Strategy and Policy (CRSSP) at the National Science Foundation (NSF). The U.S. National Science Foundation is an independent federal agency […]