India-Sweden Ties: Forging a Cohesive Partnership

Jagannath Panda, Niklas Swanström and Mahima Duggal
From areas like human rights and political differences to climate and sustainability, both countries often differ on certain points, sometimes causing friction in their bilateral relations. Most prominently, India and Sweden differ notably in their approach to Russia. While New Delhi sees Russia as a historical ally and key supplier of defense equipment, Sweden (and the EU at large) views Russia as an imminent security threat. These distinct approaches are shaped not only by their historical lenses, but also by their different strategic priorities and geopolitical alignments. Both countries have sought to manage these differences pragmatically while continuing to focus on other areas of cooperation.
Despite these challenges, the India-Sweden relationship is marked by mutual respect and underpinned by robust economic relations. Both are regarded as natural partners in that they share strong democratic values, pluralism, and institutional foundations. Although Russia remains a point of divergence, India and Sweden have thus far navigated the issue well. In fact, many voices in Europe would argue that the strategic value of EU-India relations outweighs disagreements, and there is a need to continue to interact and collaborate on points of convergence. India’s rising economic and strategic profile underscores its strategic importance for Sweden. As the world’s fifth-largest economy, India is a hub for trade, investment, and innovation, attracting global attention with its thriving start-up ecosystem and ambitious digital transformation. Strategically too, India occupies a pivotal location in the Indo-Pacific, serving as a key player in regional and global security. On its part, Sweden is an important economic and strategic partner for India due to its advanced technological capabilities, focus on sustainability, and alignment with India’s developmental priorities.
Looking forward, while collaborations in sustainability, innovation, and defense have grown, deeper engagement in areas like digital transformation, healthcare innovation, and advanced manufacturing could unlock new opportunities. Trade volumes, though increasing, still do not reflect the full potential of both economies. Greater investment and technology
transfer, particularly in green hydrogen and renewable energy storage, could amplify outcomes. Furthermore, stronger people-to-people connections, academic exchanges, and cultural partnerships can enhance mutual understanding.
Related Publications
-
Fostering Order In The Indo-Pacific: What the EU Can Learn From and Do With Australia, India, Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam
Executive Summary One of the most critical challenges of this century is fostering order in the Indo-Pacific. (Dis)order in this space will significantly affect the international order. Not only […]
-
Repurposing the United Nations to Address the Climate Crisis on the Tibetan Plateau
The futures of people along China’s western frontier changed dramatically with the annexation of Xinjiang in 1949 and Tibet in 1950. When Communist China emerged from decades of isolation in […]
-
Forecasting European Security in 2025: Will Transatlantic Ties Test Europe’s Indo-Pacific Limits?
In late December 2024, Finland—one of the latest entries to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)—seized an oil tanker, with alleged links to Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet,” on grounds of […]
-
Report of the Webinar: Climate Crisis in Tibet – Part I: CCP’s Tibet Takeover: Wither Global Climate Action?
This report is an outcome of the webinar titled “Climate Crisis in Tibet”, organized by the Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs (SCSA-IPA) at the Institute for Security […]
-
Can India Advance Peace in Ukraine?
KEY TAKEAWAYS India has carefully positioned itself as a peacemaker and facilitator between Russia and Ukraine. Its approach reflects a broader geopolitical balancing act and strategic autonomy. To play an […]