Repurposing the United Nations to Address the Climate Crisis on the Tibetan Plateau
Mark S. Cogan
The futures of people along China’s western frontier changed dramatically with the annexation of Xinjiang in 1949 and Tibet in 1950. When Communist China emerged from decades of isolation in the late 1970s and reasserted itself internationally through a strategy of rejuvenation under Xi Jinping, the native cultures that call the Tibetan Plateau home began a long period of subjugation and repression. As wider Central Asia is now threatened by climate change, strategies must be developed to respond to China’s growing influence internationally, regionally, and locally, as regional ecosystems, water storage and reserves, and local livelihoods are increasingly fragile.
The ability of the United Nations to adapt to changing humanitarian, security, human rights, and development conditions at all levels remains a critical challenge, as China has also asserted itself with the bureaucracies of UN agencies, organs, and among member-states around the globe. To respond to climate-related challenges on the Tibetan Plateau, attainable, realistic reforms and strategies must be implemented to repurpose the UN. This policy brief, designed for general practitioners, academics, and civil society organizations, makes three interrelated and interconnected recommendations.
- In the same fashion in which gender equality has been mainstreamed into development programming and human rights, UN agencies must move beyond organizational designs and strategies that involve “siloed” or one-dimensional thinking. Rather, climate change must become part and parcel of the development process from initial inputs to final outcomes.
- As Tibet lacks de jure international legal recognition, climate diplomacy and policy must be led and directed from Central Asian countries. As the region lacks both the capacity and prerequisite climate “champions, the UN must orient itself to empower regional states that are both vulnerable to climate change and that are undergoing carbon-related economic transitions.
To avoid the further securitization of climate policy and nationalist rhetoric surrounding the Tibetan Plateau, civil society organizations require greater capacities to analyze, interpret, and disseminate climate-change related impacts and effectively counter Chinese disinformation.
Related Publications
-
Report of the Webinar: Climate Crisis in Tibet – Part I: CCP’s Tibet Takeover: Wither Global Climate Action?
This report is an outcome of the webinar titled “Climate Crisis in Tibet”, organized by the Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs (SCSA-IPA) at the Institute for Security […]
-
China’s Himalayan Hustle: Revisionism Resistance Must be the Order of the Region
This edited volume brings together papers to highlight the challenges and opportunities in mapping China’s Himalayan hustle. It aims to advance key debates about the importance of this region to […]
-
First Stockholm Forum on Himalaya calls for Greater Collaboration between India, the EU & the US
China’s role as a revisionist power in the region needs to be addressed Urgency of tackling both environmental and geopolitical issues in the Himalayas October 17, 2024: The first-ever Stockholm […]
-
Report of the Webinar on China’s Himalayan Hustle – Part IV: EU, India, and US – Framing a Troika to Scuttle China’s Himalayan Strategy?
This report is an outcome of ‘China’s Himalayan Hustle-IV’ webinar on “EU, India, and US – Framing a Troika to Scuttle China’s Himalayan Strategy?” which was conducted by the Stockholm […]
-
Report of the Webinar on China’s Himalayan Hustle – Part III: How China Is Upending the Himalayan Status Quo
This report is an outcome of the ‘China’s Himalayan Hustle-III: How China is Upending the Himalayan Status-Quo’ webinar held on August 15, 2024. The webinar brought together some of the […]